Customizable Asset Relationships

We have come up with two scenarios that could be addressed with different asset relationship values. Instead of this being a set list, it would be great if we could extend the options to include relationships that work for our organization. We specifically would like to have, "does not include", or some way to represent that a term is an exception to another term, and something like, "by", representing that a term is a dimension or 'slice' of another term, such as 'patients by arrival date'.

  • Guest
  • Jun 18 2020
  • Shipped
  • Jun 19, 2020

    Admin response

    Thanks for registering the idea. The idea of being able to define custom relationships between terms makes sense as there will always be use cases that are specific to certain client i.e. your example of an analytics representation and dimension relationships. We will look into this idea and look to get it registered in our backlog for future improvement.

  • Attach files
  • Admin
    Jon Green commented
    25 Aug, 2021 12:29pm

    The custom relationship capability has been shipped in the product and is available in the SKT